From: | Nikola Milutinovic <Nikola(dot)Milutinovic(at)ev(dot)co(dot)yu> |
---|---|
To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, PostgreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ? |
Date: | 2003-12-30 06:28:58 |
Message-ID: | 3FF11B2A.5060408@ev.co.yu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> On 29 Dec 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>
>>As we are going to be moving to gborg, it is an opportunity to do some
>>reorganization, one way of simplifying the driver is to drop support for
>>some old jvm's.
>>
>>Is this a problem for anyone?
>
>
> This is more of a general user survey for how the driver is used and
> developed. With the upcoming physical move of the driver source code to
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/ from the main project's cvs repository we
> were wondering if there are other changes that should be made? For
> example:
>
> What JVMs does the latest version of the driver need to support? Are you
> likely to upgrade your 7.1 database to 7.4 without upgrading the JVM at
> the same time?
>
> What server versions does the latest version of the driver need to
> support? Are you using a driver from a new server against an older one to
> get some of the fixes/features or do you just download/build the driver
> for the server version you are on?
>
> What features are you sorely in need of that are either unimplemented or
> don't work as advertised?
What happened to the report that 7_3 branch, possibly 7_4 were not thread-safe?
One user reported concurency problems when using from Tomcat and even submitted
a patch. Apparently, instance variables were used in the org.postgresql.Driver
class.
Nix.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Email User | 2003-12-30 06:47:25 | jdbc hang at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0 |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-12-30 01:45:06 | Re: Multi-threaded servlet environment |