Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
Date: 2003-12-12 19:51:06
Message-ID: 3FDA1C2A.8000305@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


re Windows: pipes, yes, hard links, no (and no sane symlinks either) -
also of course no (sane) shell - is this going to be a script or a C
program?

Maybe use an option which you would disable on Windows to copy the files
instead of hardlinking them. Yes it would take lots more time and space,
but copying raw files would surely still be a lot faster than loading
the dump.

cheers

andew

Tom Lane wrote:
[snip whole lotta good stuff]

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Randolf Richardson 2003-12-12 19:59:00 Re: What's the difference between int2 and int16?
Previous Message Randolf Richardson 2003-12-12 19:43:55 Re: *sigh*