Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?

From: Olivier Hubaut <olivier(at)scmbb(dot)ulb(dot)ac(dot)be>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: PgSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?
Date: 2003-12-10 09:52:03
Message-ID: 3FD6ECC3.6070403@scmbb.ulb.ac.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Kris Jurka wrote:

>
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Olivier Hubaut wrote:
>
>
>>I'm trying to do a create function using JDBC 3,0 in Eclipse IDE with
>>JFaceDBC plugin.
>
>
> I don't know the JFaceDBC plugin does, but it seems like the @user_schema@
> and what not indicate a replacement scheme. Is it possible that it also
> alters the function body somehow?
>
> I don't think this is a backend or JDBC problem. If you think otherwise a
> more complete example that can be run without Eclipse will be necessary.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
>
>
Thanks for your fast response.

The @user_schema@ and other similar pattern are just ANT's variables
used to create the functions on demand. The real query contains the réal
schema name and function name, and this one doesn't work.

I've already tried to make some other multiple queries, without any
problems. There is only with the CREATE FUNCTION that this bug appear.

I don't Think JFaceDBC is the cause, it's only a quite simple editor to
write queries with colorization, noting else.

--
Ci-git une signature avortee.
** RIP **

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Yudichev 2003-12-10 10:16:53 OID, compatible=7.1 and getBinaryStream() in 7.4 driver + 7.4 database
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2003-12-10 09:35:43 Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?