Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Date: 2003-11-18 01:55:40
Message-ID: 3FB97C1C.3090502@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-general

Here it's just the release announcements that make us look like some kind

>of weirdos. But when you're making tarballs like erserver_v1.2.tar.gz
>then you're not only making a fool of yourself, you're creating actual
>technical problems. I take offense at it because for years you've simply
>ignored all requests to do something about it. But I'm certainly not the
>only one who considers it odd.
>
>
>
Somebody please explain to me what the hell a difference it makes if
we have a v in front of the version number?

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 02:10:30 Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-18 01:52:44 Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 02:10:30 Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-18 01:52:44 Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released