| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release cycle length |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 01:46:06 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB979DE.10009@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
> The time from release 7.3 to release 7.4 was 355 days, an all-time high.
> We really need to shorten that. We already have a number of significant
> improvements in 7.5 now, and several good ones coming up in the next few
> weeks. We cannot let people wait 1 year for that. I suggest that we aim
> for a 6 month cycle, consisting of approximately 4 months of development
> and 2 months of cleanup. So the start of the next beta could be the 1st
> of March. What do you think?
So long as pg_dump object ordering is an early fix to make upgrades
rather more painless, I'm all for it :)
Does anyone have a comparison of how many lines of code were added in
this release compared to previous?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-11-18 01:48:11 | Re: Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-18 01:40:15 | Re: logical column position |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-11-18 01:48:11 | Re: Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-18 01:21:45 | Re: Release cycle length |