| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |
| Date: | 2003-11-15 03:38:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB59FAA.1050104@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> I guess the real question here is whether we would want to revert this
> capability if a patch to adjust logical column orderings doesn't appear
> before 7.5. My vote would be "no", but apparently Peter's is "yes".
> Any other opinions?
The fact that it deals with the nightmare of dropping and recreating
indexes and fk's makes it worth it to me.
How about functions and views and rules that depend on it though?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2003-11-15 03:40:28 | Re: INSERT extremely slow with large data sets |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-11-15 03:21:18 | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-15 11:25:47 | Re: update for brazilian portuguese translation |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-11-15 03:21:18 | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |