Re: Performance features the 4th

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance features the 4th
Date: 2003-11-05 22:06:40
Message-ID: 3FA97470.3020803@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>As a matter of fact, people who have performance problems are likely to
>>be the same who have upgrade problems. And as Gaetano pointed out
>>correctly, we will see wildforms with one or the other feature applied.
>>
>>
>
>I'd believe that for patches of the size of my original VACUUM-delay
>hack (or even a production-grade version of same, which'd probably be
>10x larger). The kind of wholesale rewrite you are currently proposing
>is much too large to consider folding back into 7.4.*, IMHO.
>
>
Do people think that the VACUUM-delay patch by itself, would be usefully
enough on it's own to consider working it into 7.4.1 or something? From
the little feedback I have read on the VACUUM-delay patch used in
isolation, it certainly does help. I would love to see it put into 7.4
somehow.

The far more rigorous changes that Jan is working on, will be welcome
improvements for 7.5.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-05 22:08:03 Re: Schema boggle...
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-05 22:02:58 Re: Schema boggle...