Re: How can i get record by data block not by sql?

From: Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: "姜头" <104186179(at)qq(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How can i get record by data block not by sql?
Date: 2011-10-03 14:29:16
Message-ID: 3FA6D7FE-5684-46FC-B5EF-8DA9E1BF324C@silentmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Oct 3, 2011, at 6:52 AM, 姜头 wrote:

> How can i get record by data block not by sql?
>
> I want to read and write lots of data by data blocks and write record to a appointed data block and read it.
> so i can form a disk-resident tree by recording the block address. But i don't know how to implement in postgresql.
> Is there system function can do this?
> Can someone help me?? Thank you very very much!!!!1

It sounds like you should look into the COPY command, or, if you're adventurous, the pg_bulkload project. They might get you the speed you're after, if not quite the implementation. But if what you're really after is to manipulate the table files directly - and I'm not sure why that would be a goal in itself - then perhaps SQL isn't for you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-03 15:12:31 Re: Query with order by and limit is very slow - wrong index used
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2011-10-03 14:28:56 Re: Query with order by and limit is very slow - wrong index used