Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Unihost Web Hosting <tony(at)unihost(dot)net>
To: John Wells <jb(at)sourceillustrated(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-08 15:58:51
Message-ID: 3F84343B.1080704@unihost.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi John,

I've been thinking about this for sometime, since a couple of my
associates are looking to build a commercial app based around JDBC. The
difficulty came when we looked at redistributing a MySQL JDBC driver
.jar with the application. From what I can tell, since you distribute
the JDBC driver they assume that somewhere it's going to be used with a
MySQL server and therefore requires licensing. It wasn't exactly clear
IMHO or straightforward. So they've decided to go with PG only for the
time being, which makes running the server on Windows a little more
difficult, but who wants to run windows anyway!

As far as speed goes, I think that there isn't enough in it anymore to
comment about. Sure MySQL is faster in XYZ scenario, but PG is faster
in ABC scenario, swings and roundabouts. IMHO the only place where
MySQL has a clear advantage is the fact that it replicates right out of
the box, with very little difficulty (see my earlier post today) and is
quite robust.

Just my 2 Cents

Cheers

T.

John Wells wrote:

>Yes, I know you've seen the above subject before, so please be gentle with
>the flamethrowers.
>
>I'm preparing to enter a discussion with management at my company
>regarding going forward as either a MySql shop or a Postgresql shop.
>
>It's my opinion that we should be using PG, because of the full ACID
>support, and the license involved. A consultant my company hired before
>bringing me in is pushing hard for MySql, citing speed and community
>support, as well as ACID support.
>
>My biggest concern with MySQL is licensing. We need to keep costs low,
>and last I remember the parent company was being pretty strict on "fair
>use" under the GPL. If I recall, they even said a company would have to
>license the commercial version if it were simply used operationally within
>the company.
>
>Also, I was under the impression that Postgresql had pretty much caught up
>with MySql in the speed category...is this not the case?
>
>Finally, ACID support in mysql always seemed kind of a hack....perhaps
>this has changed?
>
>Thanks for any input (armament ;) ) you can provide.
>
>John
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Wells 2003-10-08 16:07:59 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-10-08 15:57:06 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)