Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Date: 2003-10-06 12:19:51
Message-ID: 3F815DE7.3030507@persistent.co.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jeff wrote:
> I'd be interested in tinkering with this, but I'm more interested at the
> moment of why (with proof, not antecdotal) Solaris is so much slower than
> Linux and what we cna do about this. We're looking to move a rather large
> Informix db to PG and ops has reservations about ditching Sun hardware.

Is linux on sparc hardware is an option..:-)

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-10-06 13:29:05 Re: Postgres low end processing.
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-10-06 12:15:00 Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?