Re: Client application name

From: "Eric B(dot) Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client application name
Date: 2009-10-14 17:44:36
Message-ID: 3F6C4FC7-DF1A-471A-9758-9EB074BCDA99@tcdi.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 14, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Dave Page wrote:

> Isn't that cluttered enough already?

I find the ps output uninformative. Having it display something that
gets generated from my application would start to make it useful.

Maybe what I really want is a totally different feature:
log_line_prefix, but for process name.

eric

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-14 17:48:45 Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-14 17:38:49 Re: Triggers on columns