Re: dblink_ora - a first shot on Oracle ...

From: Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, EG <EG(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: dblink_ora - a first shot on Oracle ...
Date: 2003-07-21 15:26:29
Message-ID: 3F1C0625.9000606@idigx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/21/2003 9:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>>I don't see the problem.
>>
>>
>
>I tend to agree with Peter: if dblink is going to start depending on
>stuff outside Postgres, it ought to be become a separate project,
>if only to simplify distribution and configuration issues.
>
The ability to optionally link to another library does not necessitate a
functional dependency on it.

>Perhaps it could be split into two parts, a PG-specific part and
>a cross-DBMS part?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>PS: Has anyone looked any further at the SQL-MED standard? ISTM that's
>where we ought to head in the long run.
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-21 15:27:31 Re: Bad permissions bug in 7.3 dump (and 7.4)?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-07-21 15:21:58 Re: dblink_ora - a first shot on Oracle ...