Re: Are we losing momentum?

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date: 2003-04-14 23:41:28
Message-ID: 3E9B4728.7945BD2F@cvc.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

With the feature set that Postgres has, it isn't going to lose momentum.

It is lacking in some areas that are slowly being addressed.

If they weren't being addressed, THEN, postgres would lose momentum.

We're fortunate to have good volunteers and the private donations of
companies as well.

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Several people have asked if we are losing momentum. Specifically, they
> are concerned about Red Hat dropping their Red Hat Database and instead
> distributing PostgreSQL as part of Red Hat Enterprise Server, and they
> are concerned about recent press articles about MySQL.
>
> Let me address these. First, the Red Hat change probably has a lot to
> do with Oracle's relationship with Red Hat, and very little to do with
> PostgreSQL. Their pullback is similar to Great Bridge's closing, except
> that Red Hat's database group is still around, so we aren't losing Tom
> Lane or Patrick MacDonald (who is completing our PITR work for 7.4).
>
> As far as MySQL, they have a company to push articles to the press, and
> many writers just dress them up and print them --- you can tell them
> because the pushed ones mention only MySQL, while the non=pushed ones
> mention MySQL and PostgreSQL.
>
> I have been around the globe enough to know that PostgreSQL is well on
> track. Our user base is growing, we have Win32 and PITR ready for 7.4
> (and each had some commercial funding to make them happen.) Recently, I
> have also been fielding questions from several companies that want to
> hire PostgreSQL developers to work for the community.
>
> But most importantly, there is mind share. I get _very_ few questions
> about MySQL anymore, and when the database topic comes up on Slashdot,
> the MySQL guys usually end up looking foolish for using MySQL. And my
> recent trip to Toronto (who's details I have shared with core but can
> not discuss) left no doubt in my mind that PostgreSQL is moving forward
> at a rapid rate.
>
> And, I have 1.5k emails to read after a one week trip. :-)
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-14 23:54:27 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-14 22:37:57 Are we losing momentum?

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2003-04-14 23:52:10 Re: Help using pgfsck
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-14 23:08:24 Re: Strange query optimization in 7.3.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-14 23:54:27 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-14 22:37:57 Are we losing momentum?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-14 23:54:27 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Nic Ferrier 2003-04-14 22:51:06 refcursor handling patch