| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com, patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com, darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, jrnield(at)usol(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.4 items |
| Date: | 2002-12-14 07:02:49 |
| Message-ID: | 3DFAD799.6030904@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joe Conway wrote:
<snip>
>>>Point-In-Time Recovery (PITR)
>>>
>>> J. R. Nield did a PITR patch late in 7.3 development, and Patrick
>>> MacDonald from Red Hat is working on merging it into CVS and
>>> adding any missing pieces. Patrick, do you have an ETA on that?
>>
>>As Hannu asked (and related to your question below), is there any thought of
>>extending this to allow simple log based replication? In many important
>>scenarios that would be more than adequate, and simpler to set up.
<snip>
For PITR-log-based-replication, how much data would be required to be pushed out to each slave system in order to bring
it up to date?
I'm having visions of a 16MB WAL file being pushed out to slave systems in order to update them with a few rows of data...
:-/
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-12-14 07:34:43 | Re: Big 7.4 items |
| Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-12-14 06:55:05 | Re: Big 7.4 items |