Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Date: 2012-05-14 18:34:12
Message-ID: 3D7113F3-A960-4B0A-B55E-35A1742ACD6F@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 13, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> More issues: promoting intermediate standby breaks replication.
>
> To be a bit blunt here, has anyone tested cascading replication *at all*
> before this?

Josh, do you have scripts that you're using to do this testing? If so can you post them somewhere?

AFAIK we don't have any regression tests for all this replication stuff, but ISTM that we need some...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-05-14 19:05:21 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-05-14 18:24:15 Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog