| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Ron Snyder <snyder(at)roguewave(dot)com>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-08-07 04:49:38 |
| Message-ID: | 3D50A6E2.5050507@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>>OK, here is the request for vote. Do we want:
>
>
>> 1) the old secondary passwords re-added
>> 2) the new prefixing of the database name to the username when enabled
>> 3) do nothing
>
>
> I vote for 2b), username(at)database ...
>
I like that too -- and it has the added benefit of being similar to
Oracle (username(at)tns_servicename; tns_servicename is really just a
pointer to the IP/port of a specific Oracle database).
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-08-07 04:55:41 | Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-08-07 04:48:51 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |