Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To:
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date: 2002-08-04 23:17:49
Message-ID: 3D4DB61D.1010703@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway wrote:
> These are all with FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 16.
>
> #define NAMEDATALEN 32
> du -h --max-depth=1 /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/
> 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/1
> 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16862
> 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16863
> 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16864
> 3.2M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16865
> 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16866
> 2.7M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/17117
> 19M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base
>

FWIW, this is FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 *and* NAMEDATALEN 128
du -h --max-depth=1 /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/
4.1M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/1
4.1M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16863
4.1M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16864
4.1M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16865
4.8M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16866
4.1M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base/16867
26M /opt/data/pgsql/data/base

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-04 23:27:35 Re: Planned simplification of catalog index updates
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-08-04 23:03:10 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src include/utils/timestamp.h bac ...