Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime
Date: 2002-05-04 14:21:41
Message-ID: 3CD3EE75.5A463524@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw wrote:
>
> Upon doing some inspection of apache 2.x, it seems that me making a SysV
> Windows .DLL for PostgreSQL, while a cool project, would be unnecessary.
>
> The APR (Apache Portable Runtime) seems to have all the necessary support. The
> problem is that it has its own API.
>
> We should find a way to extract the APR out of apache and make it a library
> within PostgreSQL. A quick look at the license seems to indicate this is OK.
> Should we notify the Apache guys just to be polite?

Definitely. They make also be able to offer some tips and guidance
(i.e. there may already be a way of splitting it off easy, etc), but
we'll never know if we don't say hello. (Hey, that rhymes!)

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


> It looks like the APR is pretty analogous to SysV with a few changes, so it
> should not be too hard to code it into PostgrsSQL.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-05-04 14:22:42 Re: Native Windows, Apache Portable Runtime
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-05-04 14:09:23 Re: Using views and MS access via odbc