From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Kym Farnik <kym(at)recalldesign(dot)com> |
Cc: | keithmur(at)mindspring(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] DLM Oracle/Compaq/OpenVMS |
Date: | 2002-05-03 01:06:42 |
Message-ID: | 3CD1E2A2.C4BF2103@fourpalms.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
(redirected to -hackers)
> > * Is there anything open about the DLM spec or code? I.e., could it
> > actually be used in a project like PostgreSQL?
The code is not open (despite the OpenDLM name :/
> > * Is there any open source equivalent?
http://oss.software.ibm.com/dlm/
> > * Have you looked at any PostgreSQL code and thought about how the DLM
> > might be incorporated? (I'm not even really much of a C coder, but the
> > idea is exciting to me).
Yes. But it wasn't worth thinking about too hard because afaict there
were no reasonable distributed lock managers available.
The gborg-based replication project probably needs a distributed lock
manager. Not sure what it uses currently, and it looks to me that IBM's
contribution stalled out for the last few months. There is a little
activity on their mailing list but they missed an "any day now" release
back in October or November...
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darren Ferguson | 2002-05-03 01:11:30 | Re: select from function |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-03 00:44:27 | Re: Subject: bool / vacuum full bug followup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-03 01:10:40 | Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-05-03 00:50:17 | Re: Consistency problem with unlabeled intervals |