Re: [GENERAL] DLM Oracle/Compaq/OpenVMS

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Kym Farnik <kym(at)recalldesign(dot)com>
Cc: keithmur(at)mindspring(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] DLM Oracle/Compaq/OpenVMS
Date: 2002-05-03 01:06:42
Message-ID: 3CD1E2A2.C4BF2103@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

(redirected to -hackers)

> > * Is there anything open about the DLM spec or code? I.e., could it
> > actually be used in a project like PostgreSQL?

The code is not open (despite the OpenDLM name :/

> > * Is there any open source equivalent?

http://oss.software.ibm.com/dlm/

> > * Have you looked at any PostgreSQL code and thought about how the DLM
> > might be incorporated? (I'm not even really much of a C coder, but the
> > idea is exciting to me).

Yes. But it wasn't worth thinking about too hard because afaict there
were no reasonable distributed lock managers available.

The gborg-based replication project probably needs a distributed lock
manager. Not sure what it uses currently, and it looks to me that IBM's
contribution stalled out for the last few months. There is a little
activity on their mailing list but they missed an "any day now" release
back in October or November...

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Ferguson 2002-05-03 01:11:30 Re: select from function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-05-03 00:44:27 Re: Subject: bool / vacuum full bug followup

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-03 01:10:40 Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-05-03 00:50:17 Re: Consistency problem with unlabeled intervals