Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, alavoor <alavoor(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-22 02:59:45
Message-ID: 3C4CD5A1.849AC678@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

...
> Tom, the word "uncomfortable" was removed. Maybe you should reread it.

Reread what? There are several threads going on at once afaict (or at
least afa-my-mailer-ct). If we are comfortable with the current
arrangement, then why bother trying to explain it ad infinitum?

I'm also not sure why this thread is on -general rather than on
-hackers, but that has been true of lots of threads recently...

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-01-22 03:18:10 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Don Baccus 2002-01-22 02:41:59 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-01-22 03:18:10 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Don Baccus 2002-01-22 02:41:59 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL