| From: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | alavoor <alavoor(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Date: | 2002-01-20 21:50:42 |
| Message-ID: | 3C4B3BB2.6F9F6130@mohawksoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
alavoor wrote:
>
> Is is possible to add GNU/GPL licence to the next
> release of the pgsql in addition to the UCB licence.
>
> The UCB licence applies to old code several years ago,
> but by law it is required to include it forever with
> pgsql.
>
> I am proposing that in addition to UCB, all the new
> code added/changed after the UCB code must be covered
> under GNU/GPL.
>
> Gnu/GPL is the best licensing scheme for open source
> products.
Don't go there man. It is a long discussion and many people do not share your
views.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-01-20 21:54:23 | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Steve Boyle (Roselink) | 2002-01-20 21:47:38 | Re: PL/pgSQL: dynamic tablename |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-01-20 21:54:23 | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-20 21:43:45 | Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |