Re: anyone knows about pam_pgsql ?

From: Tommi Mäkitalo <t(dot)maekitalo(at)epgmbh(dot)de>
To: postgres mailinglist <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: anyone knows about pam_pgsql ?
Date: 2001-11-20 15:00:41
Message-ID: 3BFA7019.1010003@epgmbh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello Peter,

there is another pam-module, which might work. You can find it in
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sysauth-pgsql. I'm not sure how good
this work. I tried nss-pgsql version 0.9.0 from the same author and run
into massive problems. Maybe version 1.0.0 is better. I didn't try it.
My solution was to create my own version of nss-pgsql. If you need it,
you can find it on my homepage http://www.maekitalo.de.

Tommi

Peter Pilsl wrote:

>trying for days now to get documentation about this tool that would
>allow me to authenticate users for different services via a
>postgres-database on my linuxsystem.
>
>I obtained two versions: 0.03 which I cant even compile and 0.9.3
>which I can compile but there is not a single byte docs coming with
>it, so I tried based on two postings from googles and failed ...
>
>#%PAM-1.0
>
>auth sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_pgsql.so user=peter passwd=xxxx host=limpio.local db=auth table=users usercolumn=username passwdcolumn=userpass crypt=1 where=status=1
>
>
>the failmessage was (definitely OT here ...)
>Nov 20 12:59:54 lupo imapd[14134]: accepted connection
>Nov 20 12:59:58 lupo imapd[14134]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/local/lib/pam_pgsql.so)
>Nov 20 12:59:58 lupo imapd[14134]: PAM [dlerror: /usr/local/lib/pam_pgsql.so: undefined symbol: sqlca]
>Nov 20 12:59:58 lupo imapd[14134]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/local/lib/pam_pgsql.so
>Nov 20 13:00:01 lupo master[26807]: process 14134 exited, status 0
>
>thnx,
>peter
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-11-20 15:14:26 Re: postgresql-7.2b2 NetBSD/Alpha 1.5W passed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-20 14:56:02 Re: problem with localization