Re: 7.2 items

From: "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.2 items
Date: 2001-05-11 15:25:41
Message-ID: 3AFC0475.2000500@monsterlabs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which ones
> people were thinking about for 7.2?
>
> * Allow inherited tables to inherit index, UNIQUE constraint, and primary key
> [inheritance]

i was wondering if there was any thought still being given to Oliver
Elphick's post from a while back that is still in TODO.detail
[inheritance]:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/todo.detail/inheritance/msg00010.html

i kind of feel as though the inheritance semantics for postgres at the
moment are not fully fleshed out, and including further features without
having a full plan for the semantics doesn't seem to advance the effort
of making postgres a true Object-Relational DBMS.

for my part, as a user, i am excited that inheritance is available even
in a limited fashion, but where i use it, i have basically had to invent
my own semantics for referential integrity based on a suite of triggers.
this issue is addressed in Oliver's post, but i was wondering if such
issues were still a part of the development dialogue since Oliver's post
was the last in TODO.detail [inheritance] and seemed to merit no
response (or any that i could find in the mailing list archives).

-tfo

In response to

  • 7.2 items at 2001-05-10 17:20:59 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ned Wolpert 2001-05-11 15:36:49 Re: 7.2 items
Previous Message Roberto Mello 2001-05-11 15:06:05 Re: [HACKERS] Problems in porting from Oracle to Postgres