Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> ... So now I'd like to add a
> new option to it: "textarray". This option would require that the
> foreign table have exactly one field, of type text[], and would compose
> all the field strings read from the file for each record into the array
> (however many there are).
Why is this a good thing? It seems like it would accomplish little
except to defeat the SQL type system entirely.
regards, tom lane