From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Strange error related to temporary tables |
Date: | 2006-09-01 14:27:00 |
Message-ID: | 3895.1157120820@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> writes:
> I executed what you suggest below, see the results below. Short
> conclusion: the type is there in pg_type, the relation is not there in
> pg_class. Is there anything I should look for more ?
> test03=> select oid, xmin from pg_type where typname = 'temp_report';
> oid | xmin
> ----------+-----------
> 58293995 | 220215039
> (1 row)
Is this xmin quite a bit older than what you get for a freshly-created
temp table? Can you find any entries in pg_depend that show the above
OID as either objid or refobjid?
Also, it's fairly likely (not certain) that the table associated with
this pg_type entry had OID one less, ie 58293994. Can you find any
trace of that OID in pg_depend, or in pg_class for that matter?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bricklen Anderson | 2006-09-01 14:39:45 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Thought provoking piece on NetBSD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-01 14:19:46 | Re: Trigger (Transaction related) |