| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Date/time type |
| Date: | 2000-01-21 03:11:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3887CE78.5ACBF3EE@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> ... I was thinking along the lines of
> If you want me to help writing something like this up, tell me.
Well, looks like you just did. If you want to plop it into sgml and
commit it, that would be great. Otherwise, I'll steal it and do it
sometime soon ;)
> This is by no means to bash the documentation writers, I just like the
> idea of supporting standard SQL over Postgres'isms where both are
> equivalent. See also CAST vs ::, etc.
Right, I'm happy going through the docs and emphasizing SQL92 vs older
"Pig-isms" for equivalent features. For 7.0, I'd also like to go
through and reorganize the User's Guide, but I'm not sure if I'll get
time...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-21 03:14:10 | RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-21 03:10:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates |