Re: community decision-making & 8.5

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: community decision-making & 8.5
Date: 2009-09-04 02:00:28
Message-ID: 37ed240d0909031900q5e82defbj4b2680900ef5561c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/9/4 Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> And /me pokes Brendan Jurd.  :-)
>>
>
> Hah! I almost listed him. /me adds a poke to Brendan Jurd.
>

/me stirs from sleep to announce "huh? whaddyawant?"

Seriously though, I have been keeping an eye on this thread, and I
think it's heading in an interesting and positive direction.

Still I'm a little unclear on what would be expected of, and indeed
what I could contribute to, the "release team" effort.

So far in the thread I've seen mention of
deciding/announcing/enforcing project deadlines, managing commit
fests, beta testing and beta-to-release items. Is that about the
right idea?

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2009-09-04 03:19:44 Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities)
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-09-04 01:43:46 Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls