| From: | "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc Cousin" <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Craig Ringer" <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
| Date: | 2011-12-08 17:23:25 |
| Message-ID: | 37dd90614c48f3ff51b1557cce7b8a69.squirrel@sq.gransy.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8 Prosinec 2011, 17:56, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> regarding the "enterprises won't use community supplied postgresql add
> ons" point, this completely true in many cases. I do think pgbouncer
> should be seriously considered for advancement as a core feature. That
> said, this should be done on its own merits, not to satisfy the
> capricious whims of enterprises.
I don't think so. In my experience, the enterprises are not using
PostgreSQL (or other OS software in genera) because they think there's no
guarantee or support available. If there's a third party (might be a local
consulting company) providing acceptable guarantees and support for
PostgreSQL, it may as well provide guarantees for pgbouncer and the
enterprise customer is fine.
They simply want a package with guarantees, it does not matter whether
it's in core or not.
Tomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-12-08 17:34:35 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
| Previous Message | Marc Cousin | 2011-12-08 17:16:39 | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |