Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Date: 2004-09-15 14:56:14
Message-ID: 3737.1095260174@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> Question: what is the relevance of the binary protocol, are you trying
> to send/fetch binary data via the command interface?

My understanding of the original post is that DBD::Pg is sitting atop
libpq and wants to keep doing so. So they're going to need some
improvements to libpq to get at Parse-into-a-named-statement and
Describe Statement. This is one of the things that didn't get done in
the 7.4 cycle, and no one seems to have got round to it later either.
But it's clearly a deficiency of libpq.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-09-15 15:02:44 WIN1250 as server encoding
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-09-15 14:17:35 Re: PL/PgSQL "bare" function calls