Re: COCOMO & Indians

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dmitry Turin" <dmitry(dot)turin(at)belarusbank(dot)minsk(dot)by>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COCOMO & Indians
Date: 2008-12-11 11:10:25
Message-ID: 36e682920812110310h72d22bcdm4c9d55a709d60777@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Dmitry Turin
<dmitry(dot)turin(at)belarusbank(dot)minsk(dot)by> wrote:
> We would like to obtain your opinion on these two questions:

This is the wrong place to do it.

> 2) We are captivated by price of Indians,
> we listened much about low quality of code, written by Indians,
> we are fearing, that American company will resale implementation to Indian subcontractor
> (i.e. real developers will be Indians anyway).

Did you really just say that?

> (SQL50, HTML60)

Because it seems that you haven't got the hint yet, I'll just say it
frankly: No one really cares about your desired additions to Postgres.

-Jonah

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-12-11 11:31:27 Re: visibility maps
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-11 11:10:10 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code