Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Andy Astor" <andy(dot)astor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-09-02 00:52:01
Message-ID: 36e682920709011752j1c9e6737g449759d47b498be0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 9/1/07, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Do you have any clue how many countless hours of useless discussion this
> name has cost us already? Unproductive hours that community members
> could otherwise have spent doing something useful. And I guarantee you,
> this nonsense will continue as long as the community as a whole is
> clinging to the situation as it is, driven by the fear factor you and
> others are using to encourage resisting change.

Agreed.

> Sum that up and try to put a price tag on it. I am sure if you do this
> seriously you will grossly exceed any costs the actual change could
> possibly cause.

Agreed.

> Do it the other way around please. The name Postgres is the original
> project name. PostgreSQL was a buzzword enhanced marketing gag that we
> will keep tolerating.

Agreed.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-09-02 00:57:16 Re: Information Week article on PostgreSQL benchmark
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-09-01 23:02:19 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)