Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Jan Wieck" <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Csaba Nagy" <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, "postgres hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Date: 2006-06-24 14:16:10
Message-ID: 36e682920606240716p249030a1l3788437b0af18b4d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/24/06, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> wrote:
> In the scenario, as previously outlined:
>
> ver001->verN->...->ver003->ver2->|
> ^-----------------------------/

So you want to always keep an old version around?

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Woodward 2006-06-24 14:21:02 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-24 14:12:27 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC