| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] end of life for pg versions... |
| Date: | 2008-02-12 22:13:15 |
| Message-ID: | 3619.1202854395@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> Of course we would still need to add an EOL page... I think one could make a
> strong argument for a static url for EOL info now that windows is EOL for <
> 8.2.
You could make a strong argument for a page stating that versions
thus-and-so are *already* EOL'd. What the OP seems to be insisting
is that we produce a formal policy and timetable for future EOL
decisions, neither of which seem very likely or desirable to me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2008-02-12 22:28:48 | Re: deadlock while re-indexing table |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-12 22:06:48 | Re: end of life for pg versions... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-02-12 23:01:13 | Re: [GENERAL] end of life for pg versions... |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-12 22:06:48 | Re: end of life for pg versions... |