Re: Identifying no-op length coercions

From: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Identifying no-op length coercions
Date: 2011-06-03 15:11:37
Message-ID: 35E82720-0081-4F79-9414-1C3ECEBD8CF0@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Noah Misch wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
>
...
> Is your interest in cheap varchar(N)->varchar(N+M) conversions specifically, or
> in some broader application of this facility?

Exactly varchar conversions.

>
> Thanks for volunteering to review; that will be a big help. Actually, I could
> especially use some feedback now on a related design and implementation:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20110524104029.GB18831@tornado.gateway.2wire.net
> Note that the third and fifth sentences of that description are incorrect. The
> rest stands without them. Even just some feedback on the mundane issue noted in
> the last paragraph would help.

Ok, I'll review it.

Thank you,
Alexey.

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://www.CommandPrompt.com
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-03 15:22:34 Re: Domains versus polymorphic functions, redux
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-03 14:44:13 Re: BLOB support