| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: September 2012 commitfest |
| Date: | 2012-10-10 18:46:53 |
| Message-ID: | 3561.1349894813@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> * Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
> I'm not sure if the validator change is noncontroversial or not ---
> I seem to recall that Peter and I had different opinions about how to do
> that.
On rechecking the archives, it looks like Peter now agrees with removing
the existing postgresql_fdw_validator and creating a new one in dblink:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-07/msg00629.php
So I think everyone is on the same page about this now. I see a couple
of cosmetic things I don't like about the latest version of that patch,
but I'll fix them and commit.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-10-10 18:49:50 | Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2012-10-10 18:36:07 | Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review] |