Re: sql row constructor...works!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sql row constructor...works!
Date: 2006-02-08 05:49:51
Message-ID: 3513.1139377791@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> IMO, the sql 92 row constructor was inserted for ISAM style key based
> table browsing without cursors...more or less a 'lost art' these days
> but still relevant. This is a key strategy in dealing with large
> tables. Blog entry is forthcoming :).

Just for the record, it's not the row constructor stuff that just got
fixed, it's row-value comparison. We were able to construct rows
correctly before, but we didn't compare them in the correct column-
by-column fashion. Please call it by the right name in your blog to
avoid future confusion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Wieland 2006-02-08 08:35:59 Re: Sequences/defaults and pg_dump
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-08 04:43:40 Audio interview