From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index build temp files |
Date: | 2013-01-09 22:09:54 |
Message-ID: | 3487.1357769394@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 9 January 2013 21:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If we were designing this from scratch I'd agree that a separate TEMP
>> privilege would be a good thing. But bolting one on now is likely
>> to create more problems than it fixes. Particularly since it doesn't
>> actually fix any of the concrete problems enumerated in this thread.
>>
>> I continue to think that getting rid of the privilege check would be
>> a more useful answer than changing which privilege is tested.
> I wasn't suggesting that we test for TEMP instead of CREATE; what I
> meant was we would test for CREATE *OR* TEMP to give more options for
> management.
[ shrug... ] That's weird, ie unlike the behavior of other privileges,
and it *still* doesn't fix any of the problems Stephen complained of.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-01-09 22:14:52 | Re: [PATCH] unified frontend support for pg_malloc et al and palloc/pfree mulation (was xlogreader-v4) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-09 22:06:49 | Re: Reducing size of WAL record headers |