Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager
Date: 2009-03-04 17:08:25
Message-ID: 3435.1236186505@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I think the proper way to handle it might be to introduce a new
> privilege type -- call it SELECT if you like -- that determines
> specifically whether you can *see* the options of a foreign-data
> wrapper, foreign server, or user mapping, respectively. As opposed to
> USAGE, which means you can use the object for connecting (in the
> future). This might have other uses: The owner of a server might want
> to hide the host name, but still let you connect.

How would you implement/enforce that, in the absence of row-level
security on the catalogs involved?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-04 17:14:37 Re: building pg_dump doesn't work
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-04 17:05:52 Re: building pg_dump doesn't work