| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |
| Date: | 2014-01-15 20:49:26 |
| Message-ID: | 32493.1389818966@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> writes:
> I'm currently thinking the best way forward is to get a basic patch
> without any NUMERIC stuff committed, and to revisit this after that's done.
+1. I liked Robert's suggestion that the "fast" aggregates be implemented
as a contrib module rather than directly in core, too. If we do that then
it's perfectly reasonable to handle that as a separate patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-01-15 21:35:33 | Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2014-01-15 20:45:35 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |