| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
| Date: | 2014-02-19 15:03:44 |
| Message-ID: | 31523.1392822224@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> GET_8_BYTES only exists for 64bit systems.
> Right, I got that far. So it looks like float8, int8, timestamp,
> timestamptz, and money all have behavior contingent on
> USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL, making that symbol a misnomer in every way. But
> since we've already marched pretty far down that path I suppose we
> should keep marching.
You need somebody to help you with getting that working on 32-bit
platforms? Because it needs to get fixed, or reverted, PDQ.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-19 15:11:45 | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-19 14:52:56 | Re: GiST support for inet datatypes |