Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations
Date: 2014-08-19 16:25:20
Message-ID: 31226.1408465520@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> Um, libpq has recently gained the ability to return result fragments,
>> right? Those didn't exist when libpq-ification of odbc was attempted,
>> as I recall -- perhaps it's possible now.

> I was trying to remember off-hand if we still had that or not.. I
> thought there was discussion about removing it, actually, but perhaps
> that was something else.

Sure,
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/libpq-single-row-mode.html
That's a done deal, it won't be going away.

Whether it would solve ODBC's problem I don't know (and I'm not
volunteering to do the work ;-))

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-08-19 16:29:50 Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-08-19 16:22:39 Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations