Re: Index-only quals

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index-only quals
Date: 2009-08-21 17:28:33
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0908211028h6acca53bld3338ba8fda0b140@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Heikki
Linnakangas<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> It looks like right now if an indexam has amregurgitate
>> set but not amhasgettuple then weird things could happen.
>
> The combination (amregurgitate && !amhasgettuple) makes no sense, BTW.
> If an indexam has no gettuple function, there's no way it can return
> data from the index.
>

to have two columns that can conflict is not error prone? why not make
amhasgettuple an enum?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-08-21 17:30:35 Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-08-21 17:17:11 Re: Feedback about Drupal SQL debugging