Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.

From: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Date: 2008-11-11 06:12:29
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0811102212n278644a8o7169f7c5ea562081@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:41 PM, ITAGAKI Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hello, Saito-san:
>
> "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> wrote:
>> next patch is this.
>
> I'm reviewing your patch and cleanup some parts:

i'm confused, original patch has this signature:
+ conv_strftime(char *src, size_t len, const char *format, const struct tm *tm)

your's has:
+strftime_win32(char *dst, size_t dstlen, const char *format, const
struct tm *tm

you change all src for dst, just a variable name decision but a
radical one... why was that (i honestly doesn't understand this patch
very well ;)?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-11-11 06:48:44 Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-11-11 05:56:46 failed test float8 on mingw

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-11-11 06:48:44 Re: [PATCHES] Solve a problem of LC_TIME of windows.
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-11-08 09:49:36 Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery (v8)