Re: logical changeset generation v6.8

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v6.8
Date: 2013-12-16 17:21:38
Message-ID: 30428.1387214498@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Perhaps we should just introduce a marker that some such strings are not
>> to be translated if they are of the unexpected kind. That would probably
>> make debugging easier too ;)

> Well, we have that: it's called elog. But that doesn't seem like the
> right thing here.

errmsg_internal?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-12-16 17:36:23 Re: 9.3 reference constraint regression
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-12-16 17:07:10 Re: logical changeset generation v6.8