Re: PostgreSQL & the BSD License

From: Samy Elashmawy <samelash(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL & the BSD License
Date: 2000-07-06 09:12:23
Message-ID: 3.0.3.32.20000706091223.00fa1a18@popd.ix.netcom.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


>Recently, Landmark/Great Bridge sent us a proposed revision to our
>existing license that, from what I can tell, has two paragraphs that
>pretty instantly none of the non-US developers felt comfortable with ...
>and that I, personally, could never agree to.

Sorry to jump in , but which two paragraphs were these and why were they
objectionable ?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2000-07-06 09:17:09 Re: Find all the dates in the calendar week?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-07-06 08:47:24 Re: lztext and compression ratios...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-06 09:19:51 Re: Alternative new libpq interface.
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-07-06 09:09:09 Re: 2nd update on TOAST