Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date: 2013-12-06 13:38:53
Message-ID: 2BA6907E3849415C9B7A7B0C21C4F243@maumau
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
> Heck, I'd be happy just to have a class of messages which specifically
> means "OMG, there's something wrong with the server", that is, a flag
> for messages which only occur when PostgreSQL encounters a bug, data
> corrpution, or platform error. Right now, I have to suss those out by
> regex.

What are the issues of using SQLSTATE XXnnn as a filter?

Regards
MauMau

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dr. Andreas Kunert 2013-12-06 13:53:27 Re: Feature request: Logging SSL connections
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-12-06 13:38:08 Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?