Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Date: 2003-10-06 18:26:10
Message-ID: 29923.1065464770@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 19:50, Neil Conway wrote:
> I was hoping you'd reply to this, Tom -- you were referring to O_DIRECT,
> right?

Not necessarily --- as you point out, it's not clear that O_DIRECT would
help us. What would be way cool is something similar to what James
Rogers was talking about: a way to tell the kernel not to promote this
page all the way to the top of its LRU list. I'm not sure that *any*
Unixen have such an API, let alone one that's common across more than
one platform :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-10-06 18:39:10 Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-06 18:21:20 Re: Postgres low end processing.