| From: | "Tony Lausin" <tonylausin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Philip Hallstrom" <postgresql(at)philip(dot)pjkh(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
| Date: | 2006-05-01 19:08:37 |
| Message-ID: | 296cdcaf0605011208g63208033if9f43779d8d84e6b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> And from reading that page, one can see that InnoDB tables are still
> considered to be kind of the "red headed step child" of table handlers
> by the mysql crew. Sad, because it's the only table handler they have
> than can truly handle any real concurrency of reads and writes mixed
> together (it's a true MVCC modeled table handler).
I was just reading something about InnoDB. I've largely ignored it
myself, but basically MySQL is developing their own in-house engine
because InnoDB is now owned by Oracle. And I think there's been
problems with MySQL suddenly going from InnoDB to myISAM kinda out of
the blue. So much for transactions, right? :)
Anthony
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | EbGrooveCb | 2006-05-01 20:16:15 | Using the REPLACE command to replace all vowels |
| Previous Message | Wes | 2006-05-01 18:45:35 | Re: Leading substrings - alternatives with 8.1.3? |