| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: use less space in xl_xact_commit patch |
| Date: | 2011-06-16 14:14:39 |
| Message-ID: | 29677.1308233679@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> With regards to the naming, I think it would be better if we kept
>> XLOG_XACT_COMMIT record exactly as it is now, and make the second
>> record an entirely new record called XLOG_XACT_COMMIT_FASTPATH. That
>> way we retain backwards compatibility.
> I liked your previous suggestion of commit and commit-with-info
> better. There's nothing particularly fast about this; it's just less
> info. So to speak.
Yes. There is no need to preserve backwards compatibility here, so
let's just design the records in a way that makes sense on its own.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2011-06-16 14:14:54 | Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-16 14:10:49 | Re: Patch - Debug builds without optimization |