Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index

From: Artur Dabrowski <ad(at)astec(dot)com(dot)pl>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index
Date: 2010-07-20 07:37:16
Message-ID: 29212162.post@talk.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


The CentOS used for testing is a 64-bits version.

Artur Dabrowski wrote:
>
> I tested the same backup on our CentOS 5.4 virtual machine (running on xen
> server) and the results are really weird (118 rows, comparing to 116 on
> win xp and 123 expected):
>
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Incorrect-FTS-results-with-GIN-index-tp29172750p29212162.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Fuchs 2010-07-20 08:11:21 Re: index scan and functions
Previous Message Artur Dabrowski 2010-07-20 07:29:50 Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-07-20 07:50:14 Re: (9.1) btree_gist support for searching on "not equals"
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-07-20 07:37:12 Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function